linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched,numa: weigh nearby nodes for task placement on complex NUMA topologies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140509095414.GR30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Fri, 9 May 2014 11:54:14 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	riel@...hat.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, mgorman@...e.de,
	chegu_vinod@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched,numa: weigh nearby nodes for task placement on
 complex NUMA topologies

On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 01:23:29PM -0400, riel@...hat.com wrote:
> +	/*
> +	 * No need to calculate a score if the system has a simple NUMA
> +	 * topology, with no node distances between "local" and "far away".
> +	 */
> +	if (max_distance == LOCAL_DISTANCE)
> +		return 0;

That's basically !numa and we shouldn't be getting here, so I think you
can make that a WARN_ON_ONCE().

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped