[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140509101722.GB16260@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 12:17:22 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
Cc: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] perf, persistent: Add persistent events
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 07:01:55PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> I am fine with a fixed size. But this design might not be changable in
> the future without breaking the API. So its worth to think about this.
> Maybe we allow the process also to create the buffer, there are 2
> variants then:
>
> perf_event_open(...);
> mmap(..., fd, ...);
> ioctl(fd, set_persistent, 1); /* Use existing buffer. */
> close();
>
> fd = perf_event_open(...);
> ioctl(fd, set_persistent, 1); /* Create buffer with default size. */
> close();
>
> This would solve the problem how we adjust buffer size.
>
> This requires a way to detect buffer size. See my mail how this could
> be done.
Yep, this makes sense and fits nicely with the perf interface so
persistent buffer sizes will be established at event creation.
This is all fine then.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists