linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Aggressively allocate the pages on cma reserved memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <536CCC78.6050806@samsung.com>
Date:	Fri, 09 May 2014 14:39:20 +0200
From:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@...sung.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	'Tomasz Stanislawski' <t.stanislaws@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Aggressively allocate the pages on cma reserved
 memory

Hello,

On 2014-05-08 02:32, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> This series tries to improve CMA.
>
> CMA is introduced to provide physically contiguous pages at runtime
> without reserving memory area. But, current implementation works like as
> reserving memory approach, because allocation on cma reserved region only
> occurs as fallback of migrate_movable allocation. We can allocate from it
> when there is no movable page. In that situation, kswapd would be invoked
> easily since unmovable and reclaimable allocation consider
> (free pages - free CMA pages) as free memory on the system and free memory
> may be lower than high watermark in that case. If kswapd start to reclaim
> memory, then fallback allocation doesn't occur much.
>
> In my experiment, I found that if system memory has 1024 MB memory and
> has 512 MB reserved memory for CMA, kswapd is mostly invoked around
> the 512MB free memory boundary. And invoked kswapd tries to make free
> memory until (free pages - free CMA pages) is higher than high watermark,
> so free memory on meminfo is moving around 512MB boundary consistently.
>
> To fix this problem, we should allocate the pages on cma reserved memory
> more aggressively and intelligenetly. Patch 2 implements the solution.
> Patch 1 is the simple optimization which remove useless re-trial and patch 3
> is for removing useless alloc flag, so these are not important.
> See patch 2 for more detailed description.
>
> This patchset is based on v3.15-rc4.

Thanks for posting those patches. It basically reminds me the following 
discussion:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1391989/focus=1399524

Your approach is basically the same. I hope that your patches can be 
improved
in such a way that they will be accepted by mm maintainers. I only 
wonder if the
third patch is really necessary. Without it kswapd wakeup might be still 
avoided
in some cases.

> Thanks.
> Joonsoo Kim (3):
>    CMA: remove redundant retrying code in __alloc_contig_migrate_range
>    CMA: aggressively allocate the pages on cma reserved memory when not
>      used
>    CMA: always treat free cma pages as non-free on watermark checking
>
>   include/linux/mmzone.h |    6 +++
>   mm/compaction.c        |    4 --
>   mm/internal.h          |    3 +-
>   mm/page_alloc.c        |  117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>   4 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/