linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: am335x-bone-common: Add i2c2 definition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <536CD0D1.4080903@ti.com>
Date:	Fri, 9 May 2014 07:57:53 -0500
From:	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To:	Matt Ranostay <mranostay@...il.com>
CC:	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <pantelis.antoniou@...il.com>,
	<matt.porter@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	<mark.rutland@....com>, <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: am335x-bone-common: Add i2c2 definition

On Fri 09 May 2014 12:56:23 AM CDT, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> Add missing i2c2 bus define to access various cape and
> prototype/breakout board devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@...il.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-bone-common.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-bone-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-bone-common.dtsi
> index 2e7d932..2aedfee 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-bone-common.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-bone-common.dtsi
> @@ -84,6 +84,13 @@
>  		>;
>  	};
>
> +	i2c2_pins: pinmux_i2c2_pins {
> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <
> +			0x178 (PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE3)	/* i2c2_sda.uart1_ctsn */
> +			0x17c (PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE3)	/* i2c2_scl.uart1_rtsn */

I dont understand the comment -> i2c2_sda is being muxed to uart1_cstsn?

> +		>;
> +	};
> +
>  	uart0_pins: pinmux_uart0_pins {
>  		pinctrl-single,pins = <
>  			0x170 (PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE0)	/* uart0_rxd.uart0_rxd */
> @@ -222,6 +229,15 @@
>
>  };
>
> +
> +&i2c2 {
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&i2c2_pins>;
> +
> +	status = "okay";
> +	clock-frequency = <400000>;

How did we decide on 400KHz -> do all all i2c2 devices on ALL capes 
work in full speed? OR should we consider a conservative 100KHz?

> +};
> +
>  /include/ "tps65217.dtsi"
>
>  &tps {


--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/