[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140509145002.GW2844@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 16:50:02 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"luto@...capital.net" <luto@...capital.net>,
"nicolas.pitre@...aro.org" <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"umgwanakikbuti@...il.com" <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/8] sched,idle: Avoid spurious wakeup IPIs
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 03:40:34PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> I wonder why we still need TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG for arm64. It was on arm
> until commit 16a8016372c42c7628eb (sanitize tsk_is_polling()). On arm64
> we use wfi for idle or a firmware call but in both cases the assumption
> is that we need an interrupt for waking up.
>
> So I think we should remove this macro for arm64.
Does ARM64 support idle=poll? If so, you could keep it for that,
otherwise it does indeed appear to be pointless.
As to 32bit ARM, are there SMP chips which do not have WFI?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists