[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140509155726.GK7950@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 16:57:26 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Larry Bassel <larry.bassel@...aro.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"khilman@...aro.org" <khilman@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Support arch_irq_work_raise() via self IPIs
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 09:48:27PM +0100, Larry Bassel wrote:
> Support for arch_irq_work_raise() was missing from
> arm64 (a prerequisite for FULL_NOHZ).
>
> This patch is based on the arm32 patch ARM 7872/1
> which ports cleanly.
[...]
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_WORK
> +void arch_irq_work_raise(void)
> +{
> + smp_cross_call(cpumask_of(smp_processor_id()), IPI_IRQ_WORK);
> +}
> +#endif
There was a subsequent patch adding is_smp() check here (c682e51dbc98
ARM: 7887/1: Don't smp_cross_call() on UP devices in
arch_irq_work_raise()). Don't we need it?
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists