[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1399654978.11258.17.camel@joe-AO725>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 10:02:58 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@...razel.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: Fix typo in MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_LIMIT_CPUID
macro
On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 12:33 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 09:57:30AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/msr-index.h
[]
> > > -#define MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_LIMIT_CPUID (1ULL << MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_LIMIT_CPUID_BIT);
> > > +#define MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_LIMIT_CPUID (1ULL << MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_LIMIT_CPUID_BIT)
>
> Btw, we should probably be catching typos like that with checkpatch.
> Here's an initial version for single-line macros:
[]
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
[]
> @@ -3313,6 +3313,11 @@ sub process {
> }
> }
>
> + if ($line =~ /^\+\s*#\s*define\s.*;\s*$/) {
> + WARN("TRAILING_SEMICOLON",
> + "Trailing semicolon at macro definition\n" . $herecurr);
> + }
> +
Seems sensible.
I suggest moving the test next to the other macro
definition tests for things like unnecessary semicolon
around "do {... while (0)" around line 3800.
Extending the test to find multiline forms like
#define foo \
bar;
would also be trivially done there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists