linux-kernel - IMA + O_DIRECT (Re: [PATCH 0/1] fix IMA + Apparmor kernel panic)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <29977.1399605003@jrobl>
Date:	Fri, 09 May 2014 12:10:03 +0900
From:	"J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@...il.com>
To:	Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@...sung.com>
Cc:	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, eparis@...hat.com,
	zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: IMA + O_DIRECT (Re: [PATCH 0/1] fix IMA + Apparmor kernel panic)

Dmitry Kasatkin:
> Following patch replaces IMA usage of kernel_read() with special
> version which skips security check that triggers kernel panic
> when Apparmor and IMA appraisal are enabled together.

I know this is related to exit(2), but this behaviour of IMA is related
to open(2) too.
When O_DIRECT is specified, some filesystems (for example, ext2) call
do_blockdev_direct_IO() which acquires i_mutex. But
IMA:process_measurement() already acquires i_mutex before kernel_read().
It causes a deadlock even if you replace kernel_read() by a simpler one.
How can we stop reading the file from IMA?

J. R. Okajima
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/