[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9450765.GaoRYW154J@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 21:52:08 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] iommu: Use dma_addr_t for IOVA arguments
On Friday 09 May 2014 09:32:26 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > There are people who care deeply about the performance of IOMMU API
> > map/unmap. It isn't used *just* for virtual machines any more. See
> > drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c for example.
>
> Of course we should care about IOMMU API performance. We should also
> care about interface consistency, and it seems there's a tradeoff in
> this case. I said "relatively" because I expect map/unmap to be less
> frequent than read/write operations that use the mapping. I don't
> know anything about infiniband, so maybe that assumption is false
> there.
In most drivers using the streaming DMA API, every mapping is used
exactly once. Think of network or block drivers: they rarely send
the same data twice to the device, and it usually comes from or
goes to some user space buffer.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists