[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140509205155.GH1429@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 22:51:55 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...nel.org, will.deacon@....com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/20] arch,avr32: Fold atomic_ops
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 10:43:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 08:32:41PM +0200, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
> > > - if (__builtin_constant_p(i) && (i >= -1048575) && (i <= 1048576))
> > > - result = atomic_sub_return(-i, v);
> >
> > I do not recall why we did it like this any more, I would assume both sub and
> > add to be single cycle instructions.
Similarly, can I rip out atomic_sub_unless() ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists