[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1399694090.5146.13.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 05:54:50 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, morten.rasmussen@....com,
mingo@...nel.org, george.mccollister@...il.com,
ktkhai@...allels.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: wake up task on prev_cpu if not in
SD_WAKE_AFFINE domain with cpu
On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 14:16 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> That leaves the big question: do we want to fall back to
> prev_cpu if it is not idle, and it has an idle sibling,
> or would it be better to find an idle sibling of prev_cpu
> when we wake up a task?
Yes. If there was A correct answer, this stuff would be a lot easier.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists