[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140511145224.00412e59@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 14:52:24 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng081251@...il.com>,
"yangds.fnst" <yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, bsegall@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Distinguish sched_wakeup event when wake up a
task which did schedule out or not.
On Sun, 11 May 2014 18:35:31 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> So if the wait side has already observed cond==false, then without the
> wakeup, which still potentially has ->on_rq == true, it would block.
> Therefore the wakeup is a _real_ wakeup.
>
> We fundamentally cannot know, on the wake side, if the wait side has or
> has not observed cond, and therefore the distinction you're trying to
> make is a false one.
I believe you may be misunderstanding Dongsheng. It has nothing to do
with the wake condition. But the "success" is basically saying, "did I
move the task on to the run queue?". That's a relevant piece of
information that the wake up event isn't currently showing.
Let me ask you this; with Donsheng's patch, will there ever be a
sched_switch event when the wakeup event sees 'false' and the
sched_switch event see the task with a state other than "R"? And if so,
how did the task doing the wakeup event, wake up that task?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists