linux-kernel - [ 096/143] net: rose: restore old recvmsg behavior

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 May 2014 02:33:36 +0200
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: [ 096/143] net: rose: restore old recvmsg behavior

2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>

[ Upstream commit f81152e35001e91997ec74a7b4e040e6ab0acccf ]

recvmsg handler in net/rose/af_rose.c performs size-check ->msg_namelen.

After commit f3d3342602f8bcbf37d7c46641cb9bca7618eb1c
(net: rework recvmsg handler msg_name and msg_namelen logic), we now
always take the else branch due to namelen being initialized to 0.

Digging in netdev-vger-cvs git repo shows that msg_namelen was
initialized with a fixed-size since at least 1995, so the else branch
was never taken.

Compile tested only.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
---
 net/rose/af_rose.c | 16 ++++------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rose/af_rose.c b/net/rose/af_rose.c
index 08a86f6..7119ea6 100644
--- a/net/rose/af_rose.c
+++ b/net/rose/af_rose.c
@@ -1275,6 +1275,7 @@ static int rose_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
 
 	if (msg->msg_name) {
 		struct sockaddr_rose *srose;
+		struct full_sockaddr_rose *full_srose = msg->msg_name;
 
 		memset(msg->msg_name, 0, sizeof(struct full_sockaddr_rose));
 		srose = msg->msg_name;
@@ -1282,18 +1283,9 @@ static int rose_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
 		srose->srose_addr   = rose->dest_addr;
 		srose->srose_call   = rose->dest_call;
 		srose->srose_ndigis = rose->dest_ndigis;
-		if (msg->msg_namelen >= sizeof(struct full_sockaddr_rose)) {
-			struct full_sockaddr_rose *full_srose = (struct full_sockaddr_rose *)msg->msg_name;
-			for (n = 0 ; n < rose->dest_ndigis ; n++)
-				full_srose->srose_digis[n] = rose->dest_digis[n];
-			msg->msg_namelen = sizeof(struct full_sockaddr_rose);
-		} else {
-			if (rose->dest_ndigis >= 1) {
-				srose->srose_ndigis = 1;
-				srose->srose_digi = rose->dest_digis[0];
-			}
-			msg->msg_namelen = sizeof(struct sockaddr_rose);
-		}
+		for (n = 0 ; n < rose->dest_ndigis ; n++)
+			full_srose->srose_digis[n] = rose->dest_digis[n];
+		msg->msg_namelen = sizeof(struct full_sockaddr_rose);
 	}
 
 	skb_free_datagram(sk, skb);
-- 
1.7.12.2.21.g234cd45.dirty



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/