[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1399832221-8314-13-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 02:17:01 +0800
From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
To: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com, len.brown@...el.com,
alan.cox@...el.com, mark.gross@...el.com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, rajeev.d.muralidhar@...el.com,
vishwesh.m.rudramuni@...el.com, nicole.chalhoub@...el.com,
ajaya.durg@...el.com, harinarayanan.seshadri@...el.com,
jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
yuyang.du@...el.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 12/12 v2] Intercept RT scheduler
We intercept load balancing to contain the load and load balancing in
the consolidated CPUs according to our consolidating mechanism.
In RT scheduler, we also skip pulling/selecting task to the idle
non-consolidated CPUs. This is pretty provocative.
Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
---
kernel/sched/rt.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index bd2267a..f8141fb 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1217,6 +1217,9 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flag, int flags)
{
struct task_struct *curr;
struct rq *rq;
+#ifdef CONFIG_WORKLOAD_CONSOLIDATION
+ int do_find = 0;
+#endif
if (p->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
goto out;
@@ -1230,6 +1233,11 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flag, int flags)
rcu_read_lock();
curr = ACCESS_ONCE(rq->curr); /* unlocked access */
+#ifdef CONFIG_WORKLOAD_CONSOLIDATION
+ if (workload_consolidation_cpu_shielded(cpu))
+ do_find = 1;
+#endif
+
/*
* If the current task on @p's runqueue is an RT task, then
* try to see if we can wake this RT task up on another
@@ -1252,9 +1260,15 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flag, int flags)
* This test is optimistic, if we get it wrong the load-balancer
* will have to sort it out.
*/
+#ifdef CONFIG_WORKLOAD_CONSOLIDATION
+ if (do_find || (curr && unlikely(rt_task(curr)) &&
+ (curr->nr_cpus_allowed < 2 ||
+ curr->prio <= p->prio))) {
+#else
if (curr && unlikely(rt_task(curr)) &&
(curr->nr_cpus_allowed < 2 ||
curr->prio <= p->prio)) {
+#endif
int target = find_lowest_rq(p);
if (target != -1)
@@ -1460,6 +1474,12 @@ static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task)
if (!cpupri_find(&task_rq(task)->rd->cpupri, task, lowest_mask))
return -1; /* No targets found */
+#ifdef CONFIG_WORKLOAD_CONSOLIDATION
+ workload_consolidation_nonshielded_mask(this_cpu, lowest_mask);
+ if (!cpumask_weight(lowest_mask))
+ return -1;
+#endif
+
/*
* At this point we have built a mask of cpus representing the
* lowest priority tasks in the system. Now we want to elect
@@ -1687,6 +1707,11 @@ static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq)
if (likely(!rt_overloaded(this_rq)))
return 0;
+#ifdef CONFIG_WORKLOAD_CONSOLIDATION
+ if (workload_consolidation_cpu_shielded(this_cpu))
+ return 0;
+#endif
+
/*
* Match the barrier from rt_set_overloaded; this guarantees that if we
* see overloaded we must also see the rto_mask bit.
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists