[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <537043D4.8070301@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 20:45:24 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
To: Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
CC: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: arch_random_refill
On 05/11/2014 08:36 PM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
>
> But in our current predicament, not everybody trusts a few potentially easily
> manipulated gates that have no other purpose than produce white noise which
> are developed by the biggest chip vendor in the US. Gates which have other
> purposes may not be that easily manipulated.
>
Incidentally, I disagree with the "easily manipulated" bit. Yes, I have
seen the paper which says that you can do it in such a way that it
doesn't show up on *visual* examination. However, put an electrical
probe on it and it shows up immediately.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists