[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140512003206.005845696@1wt.eu>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 02:34:08 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: [ 128/143] n_tty: Fix n_tty_write crash when echoing in raw mode
2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
The tty atomic_write_lock does not provide an exclusion guarantee for
the tty driver if the termios settings are LECHO & !OPOST. And since
it is unexpected and not allowed to call TTY buffer helpers like
tty_insert_flip_string concurrently, this may lead to crashes when
concurrect writers call pty_write. In that case the following two
writers:
* the ECHOing from a workqueue and
* pty_write from the process
race and can overflow the corresponding TTY buffer like follows.
If we look into tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag, there is:
int space = __tty_buffer_request_room(port, goal, flags);
struct tty_buffer *tb = port->buf.tail;
...
memcpy(char_buf_ptr(tb, tb->used), chars, space);
...
tb->used += space;
so the race of the two can result in something like this:
A B
__tty_buffer_request_room
__tty_buffer_request_room
memcpy(buf(tb->used), ...)
tb->used += space;
memcpy(buf(tb->used), ...) ->BOOM
B's memcpy is past the tty_buffer due to the previous A's tb->used
increment.
Since the N_TTY line discipline input processing can output
concurrently with a tty write, obtain the N_TTY ldisc output_lock to
serialize echo output with normal tty writes. This ensures the tty
buffer helper tty_insert_flip_string is not called concurrently and
everything is fine.
Note that this is nicely reproducible by an ordinary user using
forkpty and some setup around that (raw termios + ECHO). And it is
present in kernels at least after commit
d945cb9cce20ac7143c2de8d88b187f62db99bdc (pty: Rework the pty layer to
use the normal buffering logic) in 2.6.31-rc3.
js: add more info to the commit log
js: switch to bool
js: lock unconditionally
js: lock only the tty->ops->write call
References: CVE-2014-0196
Reported-and-tested-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit 4291086b1f081b869c6d79e5b7441633dc3ace00)
[wt: 2.6.32 has no n_tty_data, so output_lock is in tty, not tty->disc_data]
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
---
drivers/char/n_tty.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/char/n_tty.c b/drivers/char/n_tty.c
index 2e50f4d..5269fa0 100644
--- a/drivers/char/n_tty.c
+++ b/drivers/char/n_tty.c
@@ -1969,7 +1969,9 @@ static ssize_t n_tty_write(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *file,
tty->ops->flush_chars(tty);
} else {
while (nr > 0) {
+ mutex_lock(&tty->output_lock);
c = tty->ops->write(tty, b, nr);
+ mutex_unlock(&tty->output_lock);
if (c < 0) {
retval = c;
goto break_out;
--
1.7.12.2.21.g234cd45.dirty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists