[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1399895733.4349.2.camel@localhost>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 19:55:33 +0800
From: ching <ching2048@...ca.com.tw>
To: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@...hat.com>
Cc: jbottomley@...allels.com, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
agordeev@...hat.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1.1 2/16 update 3] arcmsr: Adding code to support
MSI-X interrupt
Hi Tomas,
Thanks for your remind again.
The patch 17/17 will be as following.
---
diff -uprN a/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr_hba.c b/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr_hba.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr_hba.c 2014-05-08 17:45:34.000000000 +0800
+++ b/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr_hba.c 2014-05-12 10:50:28.000000000 +0800
@@ -778,12 +778,11 @@ static int arcmsr_probe(struct pci_dev *
}
error = scsi_add_host(host, &pdev->dev);
if(error){
- goto RAID_controller_stop;
+ goto free_ccb_pool;
}
if (arcmsr_request_irq(pdev, acb) == ARC_FAILURE)
goto scsi_host_remove;
arcmsr_iop_init(acb);
- scsi_scan_host(host);
INIT_WORK(&acb->arcmsr_do_message_isr_bh, arcmsr_message_isr_bh_fn);
atomic_set(&acb->rq_map_token, 16);
atomic_set(&acb->ante_token_value, 16);
@@ -795,13 +794,17 @@ static int arcmsr_probe(struct pci_dev *
add_timer(&acb->eternal_timer);
if(arcmsr_alloc_sysfs_attr(acb))
goto out_free_sysfs;
+ scsi_scan_host(host);
return 0;
out_free_sysfs:
-scsi_host_remove:
- scsi_remove_host(host);
-RAID_controller_stop:
+ del_timer_sync(&acb->eternal_timer);
+ flush_scheduled_work();
arcmsr_stop_adapter_bgrb(acb);
arcmsr_flush_adapter_cache(acb);
+ arcmsr_free_irq(pdev, acb);
+scsi_host_remove:
+ scsi_remove_host(host);
+free_ccb_pool:
arcmsr_free_ccb_pool(acb);
free_hbb_mu:
arcmsr_free_mu(acb);
On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 13:15 +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
> On 05/08/2014 01:37 PM, ching wrote:
> > Hi Tomas,
> >
> > Thanks for your suggestion.
> > I will add a new patch 17/17 at last.
>
> This additional patch was meant for moving the scsi_scan_host, because it's
> nor related to the ms-x interrupts. Probably the maintainer will prefer
> a single patch which changes msi-x at once, I don't care.
> To the patch below - you should also free the allocated irqs as I wrote previously.
>
> Cheers,
> Tomas
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists