[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140512153848.GA13068@linaro6>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 08:38:48 -0700
From: Larry Bassel <larry.bassel@...aro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Larry Bassel <larry.bassel@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"khilman@...aro.org" <khilman@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: Support arch_irq_work_raise() via self IPIs
On 12 May 14 10:29, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:23:41PM +0100, Larry Bassel wrote:
> > Support for arch_irq_work_raise() was missing from
> > arm64 (a prerequisite for FULL_NOHZ).
>
> [...]
>
> > @@ -455,6 +457,14 @@ void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu)
> > smp_cross_call(cpumask_of(cpu), IPI_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE);
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_WORK
> > +void arch_irq_work_raise(void)
> > +{
> > + if (is_smp())
> > + smp_cross_call(cpumask_of(smp_processor_id()), IPI_IRQ_WORK);
> > +}
> > +#endif
>
> Does this even compile? We're probably better off just checking whether or
> not smp_cross_call is NULL.
No it doesn't (I incorrectly assumed that is_smp() was generic, not
arm32 specific and so I didn't compile this before submitting).
I've verified that your suggestion compiles and runs properly
and will resubmit.
Thanks for catching this.
>
> Will
Larry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists