linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/3] futex/rtmutex: Fix issues exposed by trinity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140512180839.2eb18000@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Mon, 12 May 2014 18:08:39 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Darren Hart <darren@...art.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
	Carlos ODonell <carlos@...hat.com>,
	Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] futex/rtmutex: Fix issues exposed by trinity

On Mon, 12 May 2014 23:52:07 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:

> On Mon, 12 May 2014, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 May 2014 20:45:32 -0000
> > Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > 
> >  
> > >    Steven, I told you more than once, that your damned performance and
> > >    feature mania is completely unacceptable.
> > 
> > 
> > Yes you have, and now you are yelling at me for something I did 3 years
> > ago. But this isn't one of my "performance and feature mania" things
> > you bitched at me about. This is something *you* asked me to look at!
> > 
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129242481625261
> > 
> > The "stress test" you recommend back then was just to port it to -rt
> > and test it there. Which I did, and it found various issues where I
> > helped Lai fix.
> 
> And that's an excuse to merge stuff which leaves trainwrecks behind it?

A trainwreck that wasn't noticed in 3 years.

> 
> Steven, start getting adult and admit your failures.

I did admit I made a mistake. If you read the rest of my email that you
cut off, I said "Sure, I should have pushed Lai for that at the time.
Lessons learned. I was expecting he would do so after we got to a final
version of the patch but I was also working on other things at the time
and forgot to remind him."

I even stated that I'm doing better now. That means I have learned from
my mistakes. And continue to do so.

> 
> I'm cutting it right here as the following is just your attempt to
> redirect the failure to me.

No, I'm not trying to redirect the failure to you. I was trying to get
you to understand that actual scope of it.


> 
> Yes, I made a mistake. The very mistake of trusting you.
> 
> That'll not happen again.

I expect nothing less from you.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/