lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7581425.j2FgrCi2P6@wuerfel>
Date:	Tue, 13 May 2014 21:48:27 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, balbi@...com
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] usb: phy: fix isp1301-omap dependency on tps65010

On Tuesday 13 May 2014 10:26:31 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:52:17PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The isp1301-omap driver cannot be built-in if the tps65010 driver
> > is a module, otherwise we get a link error from the reference to
> > the tps65010_set_vbus_draw function.
> > 
> > There is already a hack in the driver to work around the problem
> > of tps65010 being not available at all. This patch extends that
> > hack to ensure that the real tps65010_set_vbus_draw() function
> > is only called when it's avaiable.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > Cc: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/phy/phy-isp1301-omap.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-isp1301-omap.c b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-isp1301-omap.c
> > index 6e146d7..35a0dd2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-isp1301-omap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-isp1301-omap.c
> > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ struct isp1301 {
> >  
> >  #if defined(CONFIG_MACH_OMAP_H2) || defined(CONFIG_MACH_OMAP_H3)
> >  
> > -#if  defined(CONFIG_TPS65010) || defined(CONFIG_TPS65010_MODULE)
> > +#if  defined(CONFIG_TPS65010) || (defined(CONFIG_TPS65010_MODULE) && defined(MODULE))
> 
> nack, I would rather see a real fix, possibly also fixing the original
> hack.

Any suggestion how?

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ