[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140513084815.GB2485@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 10:48:15 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Darren Hart <darren@...art.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Carlos ODonell <carlos@...hat.com>,
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] rtmutex: Add missing deadlock check
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 01:51:21PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> I considered you blamed to me.
> I would feel better if you directly blamed to me.
Well, the way I see it all you're to blame for is 'forgetting' to update
the rt mutex test for 3 years, and while that is unfortunate, the much
bigger fail is merging the patch without it to begin with.
So in that respect Steven is primarily responsible for merging
incomplete work.
Now Thomas was entirely grumpy from staring at bugs for a long while,
which is entirely understandable. That said I don't think he went
overboard calling Steven out on this.
Now, if you and Steve get this sorted, nothing really happened except
that Thomas got grumpy, which is entirely normal, what else would he be?
:-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists