[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1399972089.1797.29.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 12:08:09 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] UBI: fix rb_tree node comparison in add_map
On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 18:19 -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi Artem,
>
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 12:56:59AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Am 21.03.2014 20:54, schrieb Mike Snitzer:
> > > The comparisons used in add_vol() shouldn't be identical. Pretty sure
> > > the following is correct but it is completely untested.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mtd/ubi/fastmap.c | 4 ++--
> > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > NOTE: I stumbled upon this code while implementing some rb_tree code
> > > (and looking for some existing rb_tree code as a reference).
> >
> > Thanks a lot for pointing this out!
> >
> > Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
>
> Bump?
>
> I'm passing through my queue, and I occasionally see some obvious,
> reviewed fixes like this one. Typically, you get around to them
> eventually, but you never know. Do you prefer the "bump"?
I'll pick this now, thanks for pointing. And yes, a "bump" is helpful.
E.g., I missed this ones.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists