| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1399974350-11089-20-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 10:45:50 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux-FSDevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 19/19] mm: filemap: Avoid unnecessary barries and waitqueue lookups in unlock_page fastpath
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
This patch introduces a new page flag for 64-bit capable machines,
PG_waiters, to signal there are processes waiting on PG_lock and uses it to
avoid memory barriers and waitqueue hash lookup in the unlock_page fastpath.
This adds a few branches to the fast path but avoids bouncing a dirty
cache line between CPUs. 32-bit machines always take the slow path but the
primary motivation for this patch is large machines so I do not think that
is a concern.
The test case used to evaulate this is a simple dd of a large file done
multiple times with the file deleted on each iterations. The size of
the file is 1/10th physical memory to avoid dirty page balancing. In the
async case it will be possible that the workload completes without even
hitting the disk and will have variable results but highlight the impact
of mark_page_accessed for async IO. The sync results are expected to be
more stable. The exception is tmpfs where the normal case is for the "IO"
to not hit the disk.
The test machine was single socket and UMA to avoid any scheduling or
NUMA artifacts. Throughput and wall times are presented for sync IO, only
wall times are shown for async as the granularity reported by dd and the
variability is unsuitable for comparison. As async results were variable
do to writback timings, I'm only reporting the maximum figures. The sync
results were stable enough to make the mean and stddev uninteresting.
The performance results are reported based on a run with no profiling.
Profile data is based on a separate run with oprofile running. The
kernels being compared are "accessed-v2" which is the patch series up
to this patch where as lockpage-v2 includes this patch.
async dd
3.15.0-rc3 3.15.0-rc3
accessed-v3 lockpage-v3
ext3 Max elapsed 11.5900 ( 0.00%) 11.0000 ( 5.09%)
ext4 Max elapsed 13.3400 ( 0.00%) 13.4300 ( -0.67%)
tmpfs Max elapsed 0.4900 ( 0.00%) 0.4800 ( 2.04%)
btrfs Max elapsed 12.7800 ( 0.00%) 13.8200 ( -8.14%)
xfs Max elapsed 2.0900 ( 0.00%) 2.1100 ( -0.96%)
The xfs gain is the hardest to explain, it consistent manages to miss the
worst cases. In the other cases, the results are variable due to the async
nature of the test but the min and max figures are consistently better.
samples percentage
ext3 90049 1.0238 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3 __wake_up_bit
ext3 61716 0.7017 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3 page_waitqueue
ext3 47529 0.5404 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3 unlock_page
ext3 23833 0.2710 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3 mark_page_accessed
ext3 9543 0.1085 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3 wake_up_bit
ext3 5036 0.0573 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3 init_page_accessed
ext3 369 0.0042 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3 __lock_page
ext3 1 1.1e-05 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3 lock_page
ext3 37376 0.4233 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-waitqueue-v3 unlock_page
ext3 11856 0.1343 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-waitqueue-v3 __wake_up_bit
ext3 11096 0.1257 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-waitqueue-v3 wake_up_bit
ext3 107 0.0012 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-waitqueue-v3 page_waitqueue
ext3 34 3.9e-04 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-waitqueue-v3 __lock_page
ext3 4 4.5e-05 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-waitqueue-v3 lock_page
There is a similar story told for each of the filesystems -- much less
time spend in page_waitqueue and __wake_up_bit due to the fact that they
now rarely need to be called. Note that for workloads that contend heavily
on the page lock that unlock_page will *increase* in cost as it has to
clear PG_waiters so while the typical case should be much faster, the worst
case costs are now higher.
The Intel vm-scalability tests tell a similar story. The ones measured here
are broadly based on dd of files 10 times the size of memory with one dd per
CPU in the system
3.15.0-rc3 3.15.0-rc3
accessed-v3 lockpage-v3
ext3 lru-file-readonce elapsed 3.6300 ( 0.00%) 3.6300 ( 0.00%)
ext3 lru-file-readtwice elapsed 6.0800 ( 0.00%) 6.0700 ( 0.16%)
ext4 lru-file-readonce elapsed 3.7300 ( 0.00%) 3.5400 ( 5.09%)
ext4 lru-file-readtwice elapsed 6.2400 ( 0.00%) 6.0100 ( 3.69%)
btrfs lru-file-readonce elapsed 5.0100 ( 0.00%) 4.9300 ( 1.60%)
btrfslru-file-readtwice elapsed 7.5800 ( 0.00%) 7.6300 ( -0.66%)
xfs lru-file-readonce elapsed 3.7000 ( 0.00%) 3.6400 ( 1.62%)
xfs lru-file-readtwice elapsed 6.2400 ( 0.00%) 5.8600 ( 6.09%)
In most cases the time to read the file is slightly lowered. Unlike the
previous test there is no impact on mark_page_accessed as the pages are
already resident for this test and there is no opportunity to mark the
pages accessed without using atomic operations. Instead the profiles show
a reduction in the time spent in page_waitqueue.
This is similarly reflected in the time taken to mmap a range of pages.
These are the results for xfs only but the other filesystems tell a
similar story.
3.15.0-rc3 3.15.0-rc3
accessed-v2 lockpage-v2
Procs 107M 567.0000 ( 0.00%) 542.0000 ( 4.41%)
Procs 214M 1075.0000 ( 0.00%) 1041.0000 ( 3.16%)
Procs 322M 1918.0000 ( 0.00%) 1522.0000 ( 20.65%)
Procs 429M 2063.0000 ( 0.00%) 1950.0000 ( 5.48%)
Procs 536M 2566.0000 ( 0.00%) 2506.0000 ( 2.34%)
Procs 644M 2920.0000 ( 0.00%) 2804.0000 ( 3.97%)
Procs 751M 3366.0000 ( 0.00%) 3260.0000 ( 3.15%)
Procs 859M 3800.0000 ( 0.00%) 3672.0000 ( 3.37%)
Procs 966M 4291.0000 ( 0.00%) 4236.0000 ( 1.28%)
Procs 1073M 4923.0000 ( 0.00%) 4815.0000 ( 2.19%)
Procs 1181M 5223.0000 ( 0.00%) 5075.0000 ( 2.83%)
Procs 1288M 5576.0000 ( 0.00%) 5419.0000 ( 2.82%)
Procs 1395M 5855.0000 ( 0.00%) 5636.0000 ( 3.74%)
Procs 1503M 6049.0000 ( 0.00%) 5862.0000 ( 3.09%)
Procs 1610M 6454.0000 ( 0.00%) 6137.0000 ( 4.91%)
Procs 1717M 6806.0000 ( 0.00%) 6474.0000 ( 4.88%)
Procs 1825M 7377.0000 ( 0.00%) 6979.0000 ( 5.40%)
Procs 1932M 7633.0000 ( 0.00%) 7396.0000 ( 3.10%)
Procs 2040M 8137.0000 ( 0.00%) 7769.0000 ( 4.52%)
Procs 2147M 8617.0000 ( 0.00%) 8205.0000 ( 4.78%)
samples percentage
xfs 67544 1.1655 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3 unlock_page
xfs 49888 0.8609 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3 __wake_up_bit
xfs 1747 0.0301 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3 block_page_mkwrite
xfs 1578 0.0272 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3 wake_up_bit
xfs 2 3.5e-05 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3 lock_page
xfs 83010 1.3447 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-waitqueue-v3 unlock_page
xfs 2354 0.0381 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-waitqueue-v3 __wake_up_bit
xfs 2064 0.0334 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-waitqueue-v3 wake_up_bit
xfs 26 4.2e-04 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-waitqueue-v3 page_waitqueue
xfs 3 4.9e-05 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-waitqueue-v3 lock_page
xfs 2 3.2e-05 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-waitqueue-v3 __lock_page
[jack@...e.cz: Fix add_page_wait_queue]
[mhocko@...e.cz: Use sleep_on_page_killable in __wait_on_page_locked_killable]
[steiner@....com: Do not update struct page unnecessarily]
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
---
include/linux/page-flags.h | 18 +++++
include/linux/pagemap.h | 6 +-
mm/filemap.c | 178 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
mm/page_alloc.c | 1 +
mm/swap.c | 10 +++
mm/vmscan.c | 3 +
6 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
index 2093eb7..b2d0470 100644
--- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
+++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ enum pageflags {
PG_private_2, /* If pagecache, has fs aux data */
PG_writeback, /* Page is under writeback */
#ifdef CONFIG_PAGEFLAGS_EXTENDED
+ PG_waiters, /* Page has PG_locked waiters. */
PG_head, /* A head page */
PG_tail, /* A tail page */
#else
@@ -213,6 +214,22 @@ PAGEFLAG(SwapBacked, swapbacked) __CLEARPAGEFLAG(SwapBacked, swapbacked)
__PAGEFLAG(SlobFree, slob_free)
+#ifdef CONFIG_PAGEFLAGS_EXTENDED
+PAGEFLAG(Waiters, waiters) __CLEARPAGEFLAG(Waiters, waiters)
+ TESTCLEARFLAG(Waiters, waiters)
+#define __PG_WAITERS (1 << PG_waiters)
+#else
+/* Always fallback to slow path on 32-bit */
+static inline bool PageWaiters(struct page *page)
+{
+ return true;
+}
+static inline void __ClearPageWaiters(struct page *page) {}
+static inline void ClearPageWaiters(struct page *page) {}
+static inline void SetPageWaiters(struct page *page) {}
+#define __PG_WAITERS 0
+#endif /* CONFIG_PAGEFLAGS_EXTENDED */
+
/*
* Private page markings that may be used by the filesystem that owns the page
* for its own purposes.
@@ -506,6 +523,7 @@ static inline void ClearPageSlabPfmemalloc(struct page *page)
1 << PG_writeback | 1 << PG_reserved | \
1 << PG_slab | 1 << PG_swapcache | 1 << PG_active | \
1 << PG_unevictable | __PG_MLOCKED | __PG_HWPOISON | \
+ __PG_WAITERS | \
__PG_COMPOUND_LOCK)
/*
diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
index e5ffaa0..2ec2d78 100644
--- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
+++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
@@ -485,13 +485,15 @@ static inline int lock_page_or_retry(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
* Never use this directly!
*/
extern void wait_on_page_bit(struct page *page, int bit_nr);
+extern void __wait_on_page_locked(struct page *page);
extern int wait_on_page_bit_killable(struct page *page, int bit_nr);
+extern int __wait_on_page_locked_killable(struct page *page);
static inline int wait_on_page_locked_killable(struct page *page)
{
if (PageLocked(page))
- return wait_on_page_bit_killable(page, PG_locked);
+ return __wait_on_page_locked_killable(page);
return 0;
}
@@ -505,7 +507,7 @@ static inline int wait_on_page_locked_killable(struct page *page)
static inline void wait_on_page_locked(struct page *page)
{
if (PageLocked(page))
- wait_on_page_bit(page, PG_locked);
+ __wait_on_page_locked(page);
}
/*
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index c60ed0f..d81ed7d 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -241,15 +241,15 @@ void delete_from_page_cache(struct page *page)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(delete_from_page_cache);
-static int sleep_on_page(void *word)
+static int sleep_on_page(void)
{
- io_schedule();
+ io_schedule_timeout(HZ);
return 0;
}
-static int sleep_on_page_killable(void *word)
+static int sleep_on_page_killable(void)
{
- sleep_on_page(word);
+ sleep_on_page();
return fatal_signal_pending(current) ? -EINTR : 0;
}
@@ -680,30 +680,105 @@ static wait_queue_head_t *page_waitqueue(struct page *page)
return &zone->wait_table[hash_ptr(page, zone->wait_table_bits)];
}
-static inline void wake_up_page(struct page *page, int bit)
+static inline wait_queue_head_t *clear_page_waiters(struct page *page)
{
- __wake_up_bit(page_waitqueue(page), &page->flags, bit);
+ wait_queue_head_t *wqh = NULL;
+
+ if (!PageWaiters(page))
+ return NULL;
+
+ /*
+ * Prepare to clear PG_waiters if the waitqueue is no longer
+ * active. Note that there is no guarantee that a page with no
+ * waiters will get cleared as there may be unrelated pages
+ * sleeping on the same page wait queue. Accurate detection
+ * would require a counter. In the event of a collision, the
+ * waiter bit will dangle and lookups will be required until
+ * the page is unlocked without collisions. The bit will need to
+ * be cleared before freeing to avoid triggering debug checks.
+ *
+ * Furthermore, this can race with processes about to sleep on
+ * the same page if it adds itself to the waitqueue just after
+ * this check. The timeout in sleep_on_page prevents the race
+ * being a terminal one. In effect, the uncontended and non-race
+ * cases are faster in exchange for occasional worst case of the
+ * timeout saving us.
+ */
+ wqh = page_waitqueue(page);
+ if (!waitqueue_active(wqh))
+ ClearPageWaiters(page);
+
+ return wqh;
+}
+
+/* Returns true if the page is locked */
+static inline bool prepare_wait_lock(struct page *page, wait_queue_head_t *wqh,
+ wait_queue_t *wq, int state)
+{
+
+ /* Set PG_waiters so a racing unlock_page will check the waitiqueue */
+ if (!PageWaiters(page))
+ SetPageWaiters(page);
+
+ prepare_to_wait_exclusive(wqh, wq, state);
+
+ /*
+ * A racing unlock can miss that the waitqueue is active and clear the
+ * waiters again. This is not race free and cannot obvious be made
+ * race free without introducing new locking. Instead, sleep_on_page()
+ * has a timeout to catch the race cases where a race occurs.
+ */
+ if (!PageWaiters(page))
+ SetPageWaiters(page);
+ return PageLocked(page);
+}
+
+static inline bool prepare_wait_bit(struct page *page, wait_queue_head_t *wqh,
+ wait_queue_t *wq, int state, int bit_nr)
+{
+ if (!PageWaiters(page))
+ SetPageWaiters(page);
+
+ prepare_to_wait(wqh, wq, state);
+ if (!PageWaiters(page))
+ SetPageWaiters(page);
+ return test_bit(bit_nr, &page->flags);
}
void wait_on_page_bit(struct page *page, int bit_nr)
{
+ wait_queue_head_t *wqh;
DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &page->flags, bit_nr);
- if (test_bit(bit_nr, &page->flags))
- __wait_on_bit(page_waitqueue(page), &wait, sleep_on_page,
- TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ if (!test_bit(bit_nr, &page->flags))
+ return;
+ wqh = page_waitqueue(page);
+
+ do {
+ if (prepare_wait_bit(page, wqh, &wait.wait, TASK_KILLABLE, bit_nr))
+ sleep_on_page_killable();
+ } while (test_bit(bit_nr, &page->flags));
+ finish_wait(wqh, &wait.wait);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(wait_on_page_bit);
int wait_on_page_bit_killable(struct page *page, int bit_nr)
{
+ wait_queue_head_t *wqh;
DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &page->flags, bit_nr);
+ int ret = 0;
if (!test_bit(bit_nr, &page->flags))
return 0;
+ wqh = page_waitqueue(page);
- return __wait_on_bit(page_waitqueue(page), &wait,
- sleep_on_page_killable, TASK_KILLABLE);
+ do {
+ if (prepare_wait_bit(page, wqh, &wait.wait, TASK_KILLABLE, bit_nr))
+ ret = sleep_on_page_killable();
+ } while (!ret && test_bit(bit_nr, &page->flags));
+ finish_wait(wqh, &wait.wait);
+
+ return ret;
}
/**
@@ -719,6 +794,8 @@ void add_page_wait_queue(struct page *page, wait_queue_t *waiter)
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
+ if (!PageWaiters(page))
+ SetPageWaiters(page);
__add_wait_queue(q, waiter);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
}
@@ -738,10 +815,26 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(add_page_wait_queue);
*/
void unlock_page(struct page *page)
{
+ wait_queue_head_t *wqh = clear_page_waiters(page);
+
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
+
+ /*
+ * No additional barrier needed due to clear_bit_unlock barriering all updates
+ * before waking waiters
+ */
clear_bit_unlock(PG_locked, &page->flags);
- smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
- wake_up_page(page, PG_locked);
+
+ /*
+ * Wake the queue if waiters were detected. Ordinarily this wakeup
+ * would be unconditional to catch races between the lock bit being
+ * set and a new process joining the queue. However, that would
+ * require the waitqueue to be looked up every time. Instead we
+ * optimse for the uncontended and non-race case and recover using
+ * a timeout in sleep_on_page.
+ */
+ if (wqh)
+ __wake_up_bit(wqh, &page->flags, PG_locked);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlock_page);
@@ -751,14 +844,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlock_page);
*/
void end_page_writeback(struct page *page)
{
+ wait_queue_head_t *wqh;
if (TestClearPageReclaim(page))
rotate_reclaimable_page(page);
if (!test_clear_page_writeback(page))
BUG();
+ wqh = clear_page_waiters(page);
+
smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
- wake_up_page(page, PG_writeback);
+
+ if (wqh)
+ __wake_up_bit(wqh, &page->flags, PG_writeback);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(end_page_writeback);
@@ -768,22 +866,66 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(end_page_writeback);
*/
void __lock_page(struct page *page)
{
+ wait_queue_head_t *wqh = page_waitqueue(page);
DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &page->flags, PG_locked);
- __wait_on_bit_lock(page_waitqueue(page), &wait, sleep_on_page,
- TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ do {
+ if (prepare_wait_lock(page, wqh, &wait.wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE))
+ sleep_on_page();
+ } while (!trylock_page(page));
+
+ finish_wait(wqh, &wait.wait);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__lock_page);
int __lock_page_killable(struct page *page)
{
+ wait_queue_head_t *wqh = page_waitqueue(page);
DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &page->flags, PG_locked);
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ do {
+ if (prepare_wait_lock(page, wqh, &wait.wait, TASK_KILLABLE))
+ ret = sleep_on_page_killable();
+ } while (!ret && !trylock_page(page));
+
+ finish_wait(wqh, &wait.wait);
- return __wait_on_bit_lock(page_waitqueue(page), &wait,
- sleep_on_page_killable, TASK_KILLABLE);
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__lock_page_killable);
+int __wait_on_page_locked_killable(struct page *page)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ wait_queue_head_t *wqh = page_waitqueue(page);
+ DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &page->flags, PG_locked);
+
+ do {
+ if (prepare_wait_lock(page, wqh, &wait.wait, TASK_KILLABLE))
+ ret = sleep_on_page_killable();
+ } while (!ret && PageLocked(page));
+
+ finish_wait(wqh, &wait.wait);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__wait_on_page_locked_killable);
+
+void __wait_on_page_locked(struct page *page)
+{
+ wait_queue_head_t *wqh = page_waitqueue(page);
+ DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &page->flags, PG_locked);
+
+ do {
+ if (prepare_wait_lock(page, wqh, &wait.wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE))
+ sleep_on_page();
+ } while (PageLocked(page));
+
+ finish_wait(wqh, &wait.wait);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__wait_on_page_locked);
+
int __lock_page_or_retry(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned int flags)
{
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 02f3ffc..613cb4f 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -6534,6 +6534,7 @@ static const struct trace_print_flags pageflag_names[] = {
{1UL << PG_private_2, "private_2" },
{1UL << PG_writeback, "writeback" },
#ifdef CONFIG_PAGEFLAGS_EXTENDED
+ {1UL << PG_waiters, "waiters" },
{1UL << PG_head, "head" },
{1UL << PG_tail, "tail" },
#else
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index 77baa36..66d2077 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -67,6 +67,10 @@ static void __page_cache_release(struct page *page)
static void __put_single_page(struct page *page)
{
__page_cache_release(page);
+
+ /* Clear dangling waiters from collisions on page_waitqueue */
+ __ClearPageWaiters(page);
+
free_hot_cold_page(page, false);
}
@@ -867,6 +871,12 @@ void release_pages(struct page **pages, int nr, bool cold)
/* Clear Active bit in case of parallel mark_page_accessed */
__ClearPageActive(page);
+ /*
+ * Clear waiters bit that may still be set due to a collision
+ * on page_waitqueue
+ */
+ __ClearPageWaiters(page);
+
list_add(&page->lru, &pages_to_free);
}
if (zone)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 8db1318..20250b8 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1090,6 +1090,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
* waiting on the page lock, because there are no references.
*/
__clear_page_locked(page);
+ __ClearPageWaiters(page);
free_it:
nr_reclaimed++;
@@ -1421,6 +1422,7 @@ putback_inactive_pages(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct list_head *page_list)
if (put_page_testzero(page)) {
__ClearPageLRU(page);
__ClearPageActive(page);
+ __ClearPageWaiters(page);
del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, lru);
if (unlikely(PageCompound(page))) {
@@ -1629,6 +1631,7 @@ static void move_active_pages_to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec,
if (put_page_testzero(page)) {
__ClearPageLRU(page);
__ClearPageActive(page);
+ __ClearPageWaiters(page);
del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, lru);
if (unlikely(PageCompound(page))) {
--
1.8.4.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists