[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1399945101-21736-1-git-send-email-yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 10:38:21 +0900
From: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: <peterz@...radead.org>, <acme@...radead.org>
CC: <jolsa@...nel.org>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <mingo@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf_tools/sched: Remove nr_state_machine_bugs in perf latency.
As we do not use .success in sched_wakeup event any more, then
we can not guarantee that the task when wakeup event happen is
out of run queue. So the message of nr_state_machine_bugs is
not correct.
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
---
tools/perf/builtin-sched.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
index d3fb0ed..5b2fc62 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
@@ -149,7 +149,6 @@ struct perf_sched {
unsigned long nr_runs;
unsigned long nr_timestamps;
unsigned long nr_unordered_timestamps;
- unsigned long nr_state_machine_bugs;
unsigned long nr_context_switch_bugs;
unsigned long nr_events;
unsigned long nr_lost_chunks;
@@ -1037,12 +1036,18 @@ static int latency_wakeup_event(struct perf_sched *sched,
atom = list_entry(atoms->work_list.prev, struct work_atom, list);
/*
+ * As we do not guarantee the wakeup event happens when
+ * task is out of run queue, also may happen when task is
+ * on run queue and wakeup only change ->state to TASK_RUNNING,
+ * then we should not set the ->wake_up_time when wake up a
+ * task which is on run queue.
+ *
* You WILL be missing events if you've recorded only
* one CPU, or are only looking at only one, so don't
- * make useless noise.
+ * skip in this case.
*/
if (sched->profile_cpu == -1 && atom->state != THREAD_SLEEPING)
- sched->nr_state_machine_bugs++;
+ return 0;
sched->nr_timestamps++;
if (atom->sched_out_time > timestamp) {
@@ -1496,14 +1501,6 @@ static void print_bad_events(struct perf_sched *sched)
(double)sched->nr_lost_events/(double)sched->nr_events * 100.0,
sched->nr_lost_events, sched->nr_events, sched->nr_lost_chunks);
}
- if (sched->nr_state_machine_bugs && sched->nr_timestamps) {
- printf(" INFO: %.3f%% state machine bugs (%ld out of %ld)",
- (double)sched->nr_state_machine_bugs/(double)sched->nr_timestamps*100.0,
- sched->nr_state_machine_bugs, sched->nr_timestamps);
- if (sched->nr_lost_events)
- printf(" (due to lost events?)");
- printf("\n");
- }
if (sched->nr_context_switch_bugs && sched->nr_timestamps) {
printf(" INFO: %.3f%% context switch bugs (%ld out of %ld)",
(double)sched->nr_context_switch_bugs/(double)sched->nr_timestamps*100.0,
--
1.8.2.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists