[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140513104307.GZ30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 12:43:07 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
Cc: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Dario Faggioli <raistlin@...ux.it>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] sched_setattr() SCHED_DEADLINE hangs system
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:57:49AM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> static bool
> __checkparam_dl(const struct sched_attr *attr)
> {
> return attr && attr->sched_deadline != 0 &&
> (attr->sched_period == 0 ||
> - (s64)(attr->sched_period - attr->sched_deadline) >= 0) &&
> - (s64)(attr->sched_deadline - attr->sched_runtime ) >= 0 &&
> - attr->sched_runtime >= (2 << (DL_SCALE - 1));
> + (attr->sched_period >= attr->sched_deadline)) &&
> + (attr->sched_deadline >= attr->sched_runtime) &&
> + attr->sched_runtime >= (1ULL << DL_SCALE) &&
> + (attr->sched_deadline < (1ULL << 63) &&
> + attr->sched_period < (1ULL << 63));
> }
Could we maybe rewrite that function to look less like a ioccc.org
submission?
static bool
__checkparam_dl(const struct sched_attr *attr)
{
if (!attr) /* possible at all? */
return false;
/* runtime <= deadline <= period */
if (attr->sched_period < attr->sched_deadline ||
attr->sched_deadline < attr->sched_runtime)
return false;
/*
* Since we truncate DL_SCALE bits make sure we're at least that big,
* if runtime > (1 << DL_SCALE), so must the others be per the above
*/
if (attr->sched_runtime <= (1ULL << DL_SCALE))
return false;
/*
* Since we use the MSB for wrap-around and sign issues, make
* sure its not set, if period < 2^63, so must the others be.
*/
if (attr->sched_period & (1ULL << 63))
return false;
return true;
}
Did I miss anything?
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists