[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140513111856.GG30843@1wt.eu>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 13:18:56 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Ben Myers <bpm@....com>, dannf@...ian.org, jmm@...til.org
Subject: Re: [ 137/143] xfs: underflow bug in xfs_attrlist_by_handle()
Hi Luis,
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:08:12PM +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl32.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl32.c
> > index bad485a..782d03d 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl32.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl32.c
> > @@ -361,8 +361,8 @@ xfs_compat_attrlist_by_handle(
> > if (copy_from_user(&al_hreq, arg,
> > sizeof(compat_xfs_fsop_attrlist_handlereq_t)))
> > return -XFS_ERROR(EFAULT);
> > - if (al_hreq.buflen > XATTR_LIST_MAX)
> > - return -XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);
>
> Am I missing something or was the above return statement deleted by
> mistake?
>
> > + if (al_hreq.buflen < sizeof(struct attrlist) ||
> > + al_hreq.buflen > XATTR_LIST_MAX)
Ouch! You're absolutely right, thanks a lot for spotting this!
Here's an updated patch. Dann, Moritz, you want to use this one
as well instead!
thanks,
Willy
View attachment "0001-xfs-underflow-bug-in-xfs_attrlist_by_handle.patch" of type "text/plain" (1965 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists