lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140513134109.GA1504@arch.cereza>
Date:	Tue, 13 May 2014 10:41:10 -0300
From:	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	"Gupta, Pekon" <pekon@...com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mtd: Add sysfs attr to expose ECC stats

On 13 May 01:15 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:26:14PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > On 12 May 05:50 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > > There are some guidelines about attributes in 'Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.txt'
> > > > Though it's acceptable to put array of values of the "same type" in single sysfs file,
> > > > But I'm still not confident on having all members of 'struct ecc_stats' being
> > > > represented by single sysfs file
> > > [...]
> > > 
> > > I agree, it looks like the sysfs policy would recommend against putting
> > > distinct properties in the same file.
> > > 
> > 
> > OK...
> > 
> > > I'm not sure if /sys/block/<disk>/stat is a good example, as it does
> > > violate this policy. It also seems to have some historical baggage.
> > > 
> > > But there is potentially one good reason for putting this distinct
> > > information in a single file: if the information must be returned
> > > atomically. For disk stats, it might be important to get a consistent
> > > snapshot of the disk stats (or nearly so, with minimal locking
> > > overhead), which might change significantly between file accesses if
> > > we're doing half a dozen file queries instead.
> > > 
> > > This same reason may not apply to these ECC stats, since none of these
> > > ECC stats are likely to be changing concurrently.
> > > 
> > 
> > Right.
> > 
> > > So I personally might lean toward "one file per attribute" here.
> > > 
> > 
> > Yup, no problem. Greg, if you can confirm this it'd be great.
> 
> Yes, that is the rule for sysfs, please do not put multiple values in a
> single sysfs file for a variety of good reasons.
> 

Will do!

> > > > >> I hope this will still keep it machine readable.
> > > > >Well, this is not a debugfs entry, so I'm not sure we want to add such debug
> > > > >information. Anyone can take a look at the code and see what ecc_stats mean.
> > > 
> > > The code or (as suggested by Pekon) the documentation
> > > (Documentation/ABI/). Either way -- with a single 'ecc_stats' table, or
> > > with 4 separate files -- they need to be documented.
> > > 
> > 
> > Sure, will document in next round.
> 
> This documentation is required, thanks.
> 

Sure, no problem.
-- 
Ezequiel GarcĂ­a, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ