linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140513164820.GQ3908@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date:	Tue, 13 May 2014 18:48:20 +0200
From:	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:	Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@...el.com>
Cc:	Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@...il.com>,
	Ville Syrjälä 
	<ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 05:46:31PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 06:38:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > Doesn't work for me, I still have an underrun at boot-up.
> > 
> > I'm at a loss tbh with ideas. We successfully disable both pipes, then
> > enable pipe A and it all works.
> > 
> > Then we enable pipe B and _both_ pipes underrun immediately afterwards.
> > Really strange. Can you please reproduce the issue again on
> > drm-intel-nightly (latest -nightly should also have the display
> > corruptions fixed, so good to retest anyway) and attach a new dmesg with
> > drm.debug=0xe.
> > 
> > Meanwhile I'll try to come up with new theories and ideas.
> 
> I do remember a reporter saying a BIOS upgrade fixed that for him. This
> is one of the reasons Paulo put that BIOS update message.
> 
> It's worth the try if you ask me (the BIOS update will bring new memory
> latency values).

The fifo underrun code should be able to cope with bios stupidity - that's
why we don't enable it on takeover. Apparently there's a bug in that logic
somewhere.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/