linux-kernel - Re: [patch 03/32] genirq: Provide generic hwirq allocation facility

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1405131858520.6261@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:	Tue, 13 May 2014 18:59:44 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tony Lu <zlu@...era.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 03/32] genirq: Provide generic hwirq allocation
 facility

Chris,

On Thu, 8 May 2014, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 8 May 2014, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Now on top of that we need irq domain support for this kind of matrix
> > mappings down to the vector level and everything else falls in
> > place. I have not thought through the irq domain angle, but maybe
> > Grant/Ben can give some input on that.
> 
> Just talked to Grant to get my irqdomain foo up to speed.
> 
> irq domains support parent irq domains already, which allow you to
> request an irq from the parent.
> 
> What's missing is:
> 
> - a bitmap based matrix vector allocator, but that shouldn't be rocket
>   science to write one.
> 
> - a mechanism to hand a cpumask down in the allocation chain
> 
> - a shortcut support to avoid multi level map lookups for the fast
>   path.
> 
> Once we have that everything just falls in place and when tile and x86
> are switched over we can rip out the LEGACY allocator again. That'll
> leave itanic with its homebrewn create_irq machinery, but I'm happy to
> ignore that as this is almost completely confined in ia64 code where
> is can bitrot happily until it sinks.

any comment on this ?

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/