linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched: sched_setattr/sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53725FDE.30006@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 May 2014 20:09:34 +0200
From:	"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	mtk.manpages@...il.com, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>,
	Dario Faggioli <raistlin@...ux.it>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched: sched_setattr/sched_getattr fixes and improvements

On 05/09/2014 07:16 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 04:49:18PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> Peter,
>>
>> While looking at your sched_setattr()/sched_getatr() documentation, 
>> I noticed a bug in the handling of -EFBIG, and a couple of places 
>> in the code where the error handling logic could be streamlined.
>> Patches follow.
> 
> Thanks!

Hi Peter,

I was a little unclear on what "Thanks" meant... Does it mean
you plan to apply all 3 patches in your tree to go upstream?

Thanks,

Michael

-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/