| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140514074456.GB17409@samfundet.no> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 09:44:57 +0200 From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no> To: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com> Cc: Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Chung-Lin Tang <cltang@...esourcery.com>, Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/25] avr32: Add 32 bit time_t and clock_t Around Wed 14 May 2014 09:54:25 +0800 or thereabout, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:19 AM, Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no> wrote: >> Around Tue 13 May 2014 17:02:49 +0800 or thereabout, Ley Foon Tan wrote: >>> Override time_t and clock_t in include/uapi/asm-generic. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com> >> >> Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no> >> >> Quickly looked over some of the other patches in the series, and they all >> seem to add the same. Could this be generic, with the possibility for arch to >> override? > In this patchset, the generic one will be 64 bit (long long). So, the > existing 32 bit users need to override this. Would it be wrong to use the architecture defined size, or does some 32-bit architectures use 64-bit time types? -- Hans-Christian Egtvedt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists