[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53731FA7.3070800@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 09:47:51 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: jan.kiszka@...mens.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, gleb@...nel.org,
avi.kivity@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] KVM: x86: support setting the CPL independent of
CS
Il 13/05/2014 16:55, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
> Until now, KVM used to assume that CS.RPL could always be used as the CPL
> value when KVM_SET_SREGS is called. Unfortunately this is not the case.
> If userspace decides to call KVM_GET_SREGS/KVM_SET_SREGS exactly after
> CR0.PE has been set to 1, but before the long jump that reloads CS, the
> CPL will be reset to bits 0-1 of CS (aka CS.RPL). This can work or not,
> depending on the placement of the code that transitions to protected
> mode. If CS.RPL != 0 the emulator will see CS.RPL != CS.DPL (the DPL
> will always be zero) and fail to fetch the next instruction of the
> transition code.
>
> The same bug exists with SVM, where you don't have the emulator but the
> guest will triple fault. Strangely, it doesn't occur with Intel's
> unrestricted guest mode.
>
> To trigger this using QEMU, it is enough to send "info cpus" continuously
> while running iPXE (which places its code for real->protected mode in
> the EBDA). iPXE does a lot of transitions, and the guest will crash
> very quickly.
>
> Avi or Gleb, this is a bit tricky. Can you review it please?
There's a simpler way to fix this, by using SS.DPL as the CPL. Patch on
its way...
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists