linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] ARM: remove last use of CONFIG_CPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 May 2014 11:28:50 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] ARM: remove last use of CONFIG_CPU_ARM710

On Wednesday 14 May 2014 11:25:50 Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 11:17 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > 'git grep -i arm710' tells me that there is also some arm710
> > specific code in  arch/arm/mm/proc-arm720.S that we may want to
> > remove along with this.
> > 
> > The DT binding should probably remain untouched though, I think it's
> > correct to document the string.
> 
> That seems to be cpu_arm710_name, __arm710_setup, and everything called
> by __arm710_setup. Cleaning that up (as a separate patch) appears to be
> trivial. If I do that it would be (sort of educated) guesswork. But I
> don't mind doing it. What do you prefer?

I think that would be great. For the first patch, please add 

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Once the second patch is reviewed, please add them both to Russell's
patch tracker.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/