linux-kernel - Re: [patch 05/32] x86: irq_remapping: Use irq_alloc/free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 May 2014 11:32:28 +0200
From:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 05/32] x86: irq_remapping: Use irq_alloc/free_hwirq()

Hi Thomas,

On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:44:07PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The create_irq variants are going away. Use the new interface. The
> core and arch code already excludes the gsi interrupts from the
> allocation, so no functional change.
> 
> This does not replace the requirement to move x86 to irq domains, but
> it limits the mess to some degree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: x86@...nel.org
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
> Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org

Can patches 5, 11 and 12 go through the IOMMU tree or do they depend on
the other patches in the series?

If they have other dependencys and can't go through the IOMMU tree feel
free to add my

Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>


	Joerg


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/