[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140514112619.GA10637@mguzik.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 13:26:21 +0200
From: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Eric Sandeen <esandeen@...hat.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] fs: print a message when freezing/unfreezing
filesystems
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 01:14:49PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 14-05-14 00:04:43, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > This helps hang troubleshooting efforts when only dmesg is available.
> >
> > While here remove code duplication with MS_RDONLY case and fix a
> > whitespace nit.
> I'm somewhat undecided here I have to say. On one hand I don't like
> printing to kernel log when everything is fine and kernel is operating
> normally. On the other hand I've seen quite a few cases where people have
> shot themselves in the foot with filesystem freezing so having some trace
> of this in the log doesn't seem like a completely bad thing either. What do
> other people think?
>
I would like to note that the kernel already prints messages when e.g.
filesystems get mounted.
And yes, situations where I/O is frozen and hung task detector comes into
play happen more often than you may think. I can hide these behind a
sysctl if this helps.
Finally, somewhat related to the first mail, my preferred message format
(which I was somewhat reluctant to propose earlier) would be:
VFS (%s): Filesystem frozen by %s:%d
with device, process and pid respectively.
--
Mateusz Guzik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists