[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140514113852.GB1278@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 13:38:56 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] nohz: Use IPI implicit full barrier against
rq->nr_running r/w
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:09:03AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:25:56AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > @@ -670,10 +670,11 @@ bool sched_can_stop_tick(void)
> >
> > rq = this_rq();
> >
> > - /* Make sure rq->nr_running update is visible after the IPI */
> > - smp_rmb();
> > -
> > - /* More than one running task need preemption */
> > + /*
> > + * More than one running task need preemption.
> > + * nr_running update is assumed to be visible
> > + * after IPI is sent from wakers.
> > + */
> > if (rq->nr_running > 1)
> > return false;
>
> Looks like whitespace damage on that comment's indenting.
Oops!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists