[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1405141530520.6261@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 15:33:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Darren Hart <darren@...art.com>
cc: Carlos ODonell <carlos@...hat.com>, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] rtmutex: Add missing deadlock check
On Wed, 14 May 2014, Darren Hart wrote:
> On May 13, 2014 11:54 PM, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> I'll gladly accept new functional/algorithm type tests to futextest
> (performance stuff is probably going to perf instead, and Dave Miller beat
Dave Jones :)
> me to the fuzz tester with Trinity). But I think there is evidence we
> should build out the futex functional testing, and futextest seems a
> logical place for it.
Though as long as glibc is being silly we need to use the raw syscall
for it.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists