[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+5PVA5LHMir9W3ksw7LjssUAp_gK3MtvEy8NiDOoPeB9f3ZmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 15:21:12 -0400
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, felipe.franciosi@...rix.com,
roger.pau@...rix.com, jerry.snitselaar@...cle.com,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: Backport request to stable of two performance related fixes for
xen-blkfront (3.13 fixes to earlier trees)
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> The following distros are affected:
> (x) Fedora 17 (3.8 and 3.9 in updates)
> (x) Fedora 18 (3.8, 3.9, 3.10, 3.11 in updates)
> (v) Fedora 19 (3.9; 3.10, 3.11, 3.12 in updates; fixed with latest update to 3.13), supported until TBA
> (v) Fedora 20 (3.11; 3.12 in updates; fixed with latest update to 3.13), supported until TBA
The net effect of all of the above is that all currently supported
Fedora versions already have the fixes. Highlights one of the major
reasons we rebase the kernel in Fedora, even at the cost of fighting
the regressions that inevitably come with that. Just an FYI for those
keeping track at home.
josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists