[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53746721.6060408@scalemp.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 10:05:05 +0300
From: Oren Twaig <oren@...lemp.com>
To: Anthony Iliopoulos <anthony.iliopoulos@...wei.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Shay Goikhman <shay.goikhman@...wei.com>,
Paul Mundt <paul.mundt@...wei.com>,
Carlos Villavieja <villavieja@....utexas.edu>,
Nacho Navarro <nacho.navarro@....es>,
Avi Mendelson <avi.mendelson@....technion.ac.il>,
Yoav Etsion <yetsion@....technion.ac.il>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>,
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, hugetlb: add missing TLB page invalidation for hugetlb_cow()
On 05/15/2014 08:00 PM, Anthony Iliopoulos wrote:
> I have dismissed this case, since I assume that there are many more
> cycles spent in servicing the TLB invalidation IPI, walking the pgtable
> plus other related overhead (e.g. sched) than in updating the pte/pmd
> so I am not sure how possible it would be to hit this condition.
Hi Anthony,
I have a question about the above statement. What will happen with multi
cpu VMs ? won't the race described above can happen ? I.e one virtual CPU
can will visit the host and the other will continue to encounter your race ?
Thanks,
Oren.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists