[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtCGXVWMD9YhzorFzbEk31h27PRGzv2+ZAvzwHrSrr==2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 09:28:05 +0200
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] sched/fair.c: change "has_capacity" to "has_free_capacity"
On 15 May 2014 09:21, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 04:57:06PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> The capacity of a CPU/group should be some intrinsic value that doesn't
>> change with task placement. It is like a container which capacity is
>> stable regardless of the amount of liquid in it... unless the container
>> itself is crushed that is, but that's another story.
>>
>> Therefore let's rename "has_capacity" to "has_free_capacity" in order to
>> better convey the wanted meaning.
>>
>
> Yeah, not really, the whole capacity thing is bollocks, but sure we can
> rename it for as long as it still lives ;-)
Hi,
Yes, I'm preparing an update of my rework around cpu_power and this
field will disappear
Vincent
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists