[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140515091220.GC6434@ulmo>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 11:12:21 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, swarren@...dotorg.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, marcel@...wiler.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/panel: add support for EDT panels
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:24:39AM +0200, Stefan Agner wrote:
> Hi Thierry, hi Philipp,
>
> Am 2014-05-15 09:51, schrieb Thierry Reding:
> > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:45:57PM +0200, stefan@...er.ch wrote:
> >> From: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
> >>
> >> This panels are sold by Toradex for Colibri T20/T30 and Apalis T30
> >> evaluation kits.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
> >
> > Panel patches should go to the dri-devel mailing list as well.
> >
> > Also a patch was posted only yesterday for a panel that seems to be the
> > exact same one as this, even though the name differs minimally, see:
> >
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4175251/
> >
> > Adding Philipp on Cc so you guys can work together whether this is
> > indeed the same panel. The only differences seem to be in the vertical
> > front and back porches, but I suspect that either settings will work on
> > both Tegra and i.MX.
>
> Its etm0700g0dh6 vs. et070080dh6, Philipp's panel is with captive multi
> touch, (hence the M I guess). The panel itself really looks the same.
>
> I found this overview of EDT displays:
> http://www.dmbtechnics.com/scripts/passthru.php?id=7
>
> There seem to be quite a lot variants with the same panel...
>
> Regarding timings, I just checked the documentation, Philipp's timing
> really matches the documented ones, I miscalculated the vertical back
> porch.
Okay, so that means that the panel works for you with the same timings
that Philipp has in the ETM0700G0DH6 patch? If so then I definitely
think we should be sharing the timings in the driver by making the two
compatible entries point to the same driver data.
> How do we resolve that?
>
> I would suggest that I split out that patch and remove the et070080dh6
> panel and send the other as a single patch to the dri-devel mailing list
> as well.
Yes, that would work.
> Philipp, could you add my display type (et070080dh6) to the compatible
> list of your mode/panel entry?
I also noticed that Philipp's patch doesn't actually introduce the
device tree bindings, so that will have to be added as well.
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists