[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140515092349.GE6434@ulmo>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 11:23:50 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@...sung.com>
Cc: Tomasz Stanislawski <t.stanislaws@...sung.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>,
sunil joshi <joshi@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 01:47:33PM +0530, Rahul Sharma wrote:
> On 15 May 2014 13:12, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:49:37AM +0530, Rahul Sharma wrote:
> >> On 15 May 2014 03:44, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:47:21AM +0530, Rahul Sharma wrote:
[...]
> >> >> +#define PHY_NR 5
> >> >
> >> > I'm not sure that this belongs here either. It's not a value that will
> >> > ever appear in a DT source file.
> >>
> >> I want it to grow along with new additions in the phy list else
> >> catastrophic. This will look unrelated in driver.
> >
> > But this is in no way growing automatically as it is. Whoever adds a new
> > type of PHY will need to manually increment this define. Furthermore the
> > driver will need to be updated to cope with this anyway.
>
> Not automatically. What I meant was If keeping it at end of the list, it is not
> possible that somebody skip the updation of PHY_NR when adding a new phy
> type.
It's perhaps not as likely, but still possible.
> If I leave a comment at the end of the list to update PHY_NR (after moving it
> to driver), that also serves the purpose.
I don't think this is needed either. Like I said earlier, since the
driver has an internal maximum number of PHYs that it supports the
maximum that can be specified in the DTS is irrelevant. If it doesn't
support a new one, then it will simply return an error. And I would
assume that if somebody added support for a new PHY type then they
probably wouldn't forget to update the driver since they're modifying
it anyway and testing will fail if they don't.
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists