[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1405151242210.2112@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 12:43:17 +0200 (CEST)
From: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
cc: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Eric Sandeen <esandeen@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: print a message when freezing/unfreezing
filesystems
On Thu, 15 May 2014, Jan Kara wrote:
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 12:01:57 +0200
> From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> To: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>
> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
> linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
> Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
> Eric Sandeen <esandeen@...hat.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: print a message when freezing/unfreezing
> filesystems
>
> On Thu 15-05-14 11:42:37, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 07:54:57AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 08:31:02PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > > This helps hang troubleshooting efforts when only dmesg is available.
> > >
> > > I really don't think that spamming dmesg every time a filesystem is
> > > frozen or thawed is a good idea. This happens a *lot* when systems
> > > are using snapshots, and for the most part nobody cares about
> > > freeze/thaw cycles because they almost always work just fine.
> > >
> >
> > I agree it may get noisy.
> >
> > > I'd think that /proc/self/mounts would be a much better place to
> > > indicate that the fs is frozen. After all, that's where we tell
> > > people whether the filesystem is ro or rw, and frozen is just
> > > a temporary, non-invasive ro state...
> > >
> >
> > Except you can't inspect /proc/self/mounts when the only thing you got
> > is dmesg, so this does not really help my case.
> >
> > That said, I'll try to come up with a different solution.
> >
> > Poorly reported side-effects of frozen I/O are only a part of the real
> > problem which is hung task detector being able to typically report
> > backtraces of "victims" only. I came up with printks becuase these are
> > a cheap way and would help us out in a lot of cases.
> I was tracking down a couple of times what the hell is freezing the
> filesystem (and not unfreezing it) and I agree with Mateusz it would be
> nice if we could tell after the fact who froze the fs. Maybe we could store
> that information in superblock and dump it during emergency thaw?
I like that idea and if we agree to create procfs file to list
frozen file system this might be one of the useful information to
report there.
-Lukas
>
> Honza
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists