lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140515120703.GA25858@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 May 2014 14:07:04 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/20] perf tools: Consolidate output field handling to
 hpp format routines

On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 03:28:39PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:

SNIP

> -		}
> -
>  		if (symbol_conf.use_callchain && sort__has_sym) {
>  			if (callchain_param.mode == CHAIN_GRAPH_REL)
>  				total = h->stat.period;
> diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
> index c65a7fd744c6..32d2dfd794d9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
> @@ -352,8 +352,18 @@ LIST_HEAD(perf_hpp__sort_list);
>  #undef __HPP_ENTRY_RAW_FN
>  
>  
> +void perf_hpp__setup_output_field(void);

should go to util/hist.h

jirka

>  {
> diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c b/tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c
> index 9eccf7f4f367..e6920d124c60 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c
> @@ -353,8 +353,7 @@ static int hist_entry__fprintf(struct hist_entry *he, size_t size,
>  	if (size == 0 || size > bfsz)
>  		size = hpp.size = bfsz;
>  
> -	ret = hist_entry__period_snprintf(&hpp, he);
> -	hist_entry__sort_snprintf(he, bf + ret, size - ret, hists);
> +	hist_entry__period_snprintf(&hpp, he);

so it's no longer just period.. should we rename it? like
  hist_entry__hpp_snprintf
  hist_entry__snprintf

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ