[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140515134751.GH25858@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 15:47:52 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/20] perf diff: Add missing setup_output_field()
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 03:28:48PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> The perf diff command itself doesn't make use of the --fields option,
> it still needs to call the function since the output only work with
> that way.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-diff.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
> index f3b10dcf6838..670d191bec31 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
> @@ -1155,6 +1155,9 @@ int cmd_diff(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
> if (setup_sorting() < 0)
> usage_with_options(diff_usage, options);
>
> + if (setup_output_field() < 0)
> + usage_with_options(diff_usage, options);
> +
looks like this breaks perf diff even worse than it is now ;-)
[jolsa@...va perf]$ ./perf diff
# Event 'cycles'
#
# Baseline Delta
# ........ .......
#
28.03%
+18.93%
31.06%
+36.86%
35.06%
0.38%
0.03% +0.03%
+1.11%
5.44%
+43.05%
anyway, as I said it was already broken, I plan to check/fix this soon..
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists