linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: samsung: out: Add infrastructure to register CLKOUT

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Date:	Thu, 15 May 2014 19:44:12 +0530
From:	Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@...sung.com>
To:	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
Cc:	Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@...aro.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	sunil joshi <joshi@...sung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: samsung: out: Add infrastructure to register CLKOUT

On 15 May 2014 19:37, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com> wrote:
> Hi Rahul, Tushar,
>
> On 15.05.2014 15:44, Rahul Sharma wrote:
>> Hi Tushar,
>>
>> Basically you are adding a new clock-type for Clkout. IMO clkout
>> is not a special hardware. Existing clock types can be reused to
>> support clkout. I see 3 major problem here:
>>
>> 1) Clkout -> (Mux + Gate). You clubbed mux and gate together, and
>> exposing as a single clock which is something like a composite clock.
>> IMO this is not a recommended way in CCF.
>>
>> 2) New Clock Type: Since clkout is just a combination of a simple
>> mux and gate which are already supported, it is a unnecessary
>> duplication.
>>
>> 3) Clkout registered along with CMU: which is not correct. Clkout is in PMU
>> (Separate physical IP) and should be registered as a independent Clock
>> provider which provides 1 mux and 1 gate clock (As if now). It should also be
>> well connected with main CMU.
>>
>> I understand the challenge in using regmap interface for a clock provider. But
>> we need to identify a clean solution. IMHO a independent clock provider with
>> iomap, is relatively cleaner approach till CCF is not ready with regmap based
>> reg access for clock registers.
>>
>> Experts!! please comment.
>
> It's quite unfortunate that Tushar has duplicated the effort to create a
> clkout driver, considering the fact that we did have such driver
> internally at SRPOL and it was quite nice and simple.
>
> I will post a cleaned-up version today, that is about 2 times smaller in
> terms of lines of added code and provides the same functionality,
> without introducing custom clock types. In addition, it models the
> clkout properly as a feature of PMU, not CMU (CMU only provides outputs
> of particular sub-blocks that are fed into the PMU).

oh.. thats nice. Please share the implementation.

Regards,
Rahul Sharma.

>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives