[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140515114006.52a4e07d@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 11:40:06 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: chrubis@...e.cz
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
"linux-man@...r.kernel.org" <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: futex(2) man page update help request
On Thu, 15 May 2014 17:28:35 +0200
chrubis@...e.cz wrote:
> Hi!
> >
> > However, unless I'm sorely mistaken, the larger problem is that glibc
> > removed the futex() call entirely, so these man pages don't describe
> > something users even have access to anymore. I had to revert to calling
> > the syscalls directly in the futextest test suite because of this:
> >
> > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/dvhart/futextest.git/tree/inclu
>
> So there actually exists some tests for futexes, I've been asked if we
> have these as a LTP[1] maintainer several times.
>
> Are these tests executed regulary as a part of some automated framework?
> If not it would make sense to port them to LTP (looking at the code that
> would be quite easy task) and get them executed by several QA
> departments for free. What do you think?
>
> [1] http://linux-test-project.github.io/
>
I think Thomas may be working on one. If not, I'd be happy to start
writing one as well.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists