[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140515160152.GA7529@rei.Home>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 18:01:53 +0200
From: chrubis@...e.cz
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
"linux-man@...r.kernel.org" <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: futex(2) man page update help request
Hi!
> > Have a look at this commit that tries to deal with passing 64 bit
> > numbers to syscalls. On 32 bit ABI (but not on X32) these needs to be
> > split up (accordingly to machine endianity).
> >
> > https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/commit/04afb02b4280a20c262054e8f99a3fad4ad54916
> >
>
> That is wrong, too. That assumes that there will never be padding
> words, which isn't true in the general case, either.
Well, it's still far better than the mess we had previously and it works
in most of the cases. However I would love to fix these correctly once
for all.
> I really believe the proper fix is to use assembly syscall stubs. In
> klibc I build a fairly elaborate machinery to autogenerate such syscall
> stubs for a variety of architectures.
Then it would be nice to share these between klibc and LTP (and possible
everybody else).
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@...e.cz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists