[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16896948.U7hTsgDub4@wuerfel>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 18:30:13 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: monstr@...str.eu
Cc: Bart Tanghe <bart.tanghe@...masmore.be>, thierry.reding@...il.com,
michal.simek@...inx.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com,
mark.rutland@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
galak@...eaurora.org, rob@...dley.net, grant.likely@...aro.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rfc]pwm: add xilinx pwm driver
On Thursday 15 May 2014 15:56:03 Michal Simek wrote:
> IP is configurable as is normal for us.
> You can select IP with just one timer.
> It means register locations for specific timer are fixed.
> http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/ip_documentation/xps_timer.pdf
>
> timer0 - offset 0x0
> timer1 - offset 0x10 (doesn't need to be synthesized)
>
> There is one interrupt for both timers.
>
> Timers can be as timers (up/down count/ reload with or without IRQs)
> But then one options is to use both timers and generate PWM signal.
> From full ip description in DT you can see xlnx,gen0-assert = <1>;
> which can suggest that this IP can output PMW signal.
> (We can also detect if PWM0 signal is connected just to be sure
> that PWM can be enabled).
>
> There is also capture trigger mode where external signal start/stop
> timer counting.
>
> It means there are 3 modes - timer, capture and PWM.
> Timer (clocksource, clockevent) requires specific handling,
> PWM has own subsystem and not sure if there is any subsystem for
> capture mode. Is there any?
I don't think so. Possibly somewhere in IIO.
> Not every timer configuration is suitable for all things
> but fully configured timer can be used in all 3 modes.
>
>
> I think that make sense to register and map all timers in the system
> and classify them with flags (like can't be used for capture or PMW
> if there are not outputs connected) and then use the best
> timer for clocksource and clockevent. The best candidate is IP
> with the lowest IRQ number in dual timer mode but in general
> whatever timer can be used that's why we can't probably avoid
> timer specification in DT.
> In spite of this smells because you are saying via DT
> to Linux which timer should be used for what purpose.
We had discussions about this in the past, but I don't remember the
outcome of that.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists