linux-kernel - Re: [lxc-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] Add support for devtmpfs in user namespaces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFLxGvwfbVdLUq0NrSrQNYH+bTzYLuCE2moooHH319qRfDkS6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 May 2014 20:25:58 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:	LXC development mailing-list <lxc-devel@...ts.linuxcontainers.org>
Cc:	"Michael H. Warfield" <mhw@...tsend.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [lxc-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] Add support for devtmpfs in user namespaces

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Then don't use a container to build such a thing, or fix the build
> scripts to not do that :)

I second this.
To me it looks like some folks try to (ab)use Linux containers
for purposes where KVM would much better fit in.
Please don't put more complexity into containers. They are already
horrible complex
and error prone.

-- 
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/